So, I was reading Laura Rosen Cohen's blog, and came across this link, (approvingly) concerning Kathy Shaidle -- and one of her recent reactions to criticism.
So, here's what I saw when I decided to click:
Someone posting as 'Frip88' didn't like *how* she'd written something:
Shaidle: "When he appeared just before Christmas, he was no De Niro. He was no Bronson, either—the word “vengeance” made craggy flesh in the Death Wish (as in, fulfillment) series."And, truth be told, it *is* "a horribly crafted sentence".
What a horribly crafted sentence.
So -- of course -- Shaidle and her fan-boys/girls simply must respond in the irrational way that most women respond to criticism -- *especially* when it's valid criticism:
Bahoomba: Meow.
brewin: Shaidle is a good writer because she is uncannily good at reading people. And her killer phrases far outweigh her bad.
Grammar nazis are rarely worth reading.
Kathy Shaidle: Hey thanks, Brewin. I don't let the jibes of anonymous jealous unpublished grammar nazi commenters bug me :-)
brewin: I think the operative phrase is "you're not smart enough to tell me how to write" ;-)
Keep on punching above your weight (literally)
RevantDream: Grammar nazis are rarely worth reading.
Hear hear.
Mal: What a crafty semblance of horror.
Peter Crawford: William Shatner is a funny man. Here in Britain he is universally liked due to his guest- hosting appearances on various shows, always genial and often hilarious.*IF* one has read Shadle for any length of time, surely one can savor the irony (and hypocrisy) of her reaction.
To those who dislike Kathy Shaidle's sentence constructions, I invite you to go back to your dank couches, to tug weepily at the tattered remnants of what was once a proud young manhood.
0 comments:
Post a Comment