Michael Shermer’s Inadvertent Argument for Christianity

I don't think much of Mr Gilson's blog-name, for it:
1) implicitly assumes a favorite Evangelical Atheist article of faith;
2) and thus implies that *other* Christians don't normally employ valid reasoning when it comes to thinking about the faith.

Tom Gilson: Michael Shermer’s Inadvertent Argument for Christianity

And what would that be?

I saw a bumper-stickerish avatar over at Jordan's LJ blog. It said, "You are the end result of four billion years of evolution. Fucking act like it."

And I can't help but think that whatever behavior it is that he thinks is beneath the majesty and/or dignity of the "end result of four billion years of evolution" is *precisely* how one should expect an "end result of four billion years of evolution" to behave.

For, after all, how else *could* the "end result of four billion years of evolution" behave than however it is that it is behaving?

It just never ceases to amaze me that evolutionists *still* don't understand their own world-view.