Find common ground ... or shut up!

This is another post concerning the leftists and/or atheists who infest Michael Egnor's blog --

JH asked:

@Ilion: Care to explain?

For, I had said:

JH,
What a God-damned, hypocritical fool you are. Amazingly, you're worse than, say, Bachfiend.

Which was in response to JH's post:

Watching you all talk past each other is immensely frustrating. If you can't agree on premises, it's pointless to argue about conclusions.

Here's the fundamental question: What makes a life worthy of being protected and preserved? For Christians, the criterion seems to be humanity; human life is worth protecting, period. For atheists, the equation seems to be more complicated and involve a number of criteria like intelligence, potential contribution to society, the opinions of their friends and relatives, and some sort of personal pleasure/pain ratio.

Now do me a favor and find some common ground before continuing this conversation.

Never mind, for now, that the accusation of "talking past each other" is a misrepresentation of what's going on, *look" at that last sentence: "Now do me a favor and find some common ground before continuing this conversation."

In other words, "I'm so open-minded and above the fray that you all need to just shut up ... while abortion is still a legally protected form of murder"

The lying leftist, 'bachfield', is at least open about his advocacy of the murder of unborn human beings; thus, 'JH' is, in this regard, worse than 'bachfield'. And, as hypocrites are damned-of-God, 'JH' is, as I said, "a God-damned, hypocritical fool".