Me (on Facebook): "I'm thinking I'll try to get myself banned from Facebook -- wouldn't it be great if everyone who claims to care about [and] oppose the on-going destruction of our civilization would do likewise?
Attempt #1 -- His name is BRUCE and he is not a woman."
By the way, leftists can state the truth about ol' Bruce, when they want to (see this comedian's routine 2:35 YouTube video -- "You most certainly are not a traditional girl")
Friday, August 5, 2016
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
Attempt number two: His name is "Bradley" and he's a traitor.
... and a mentally-ill castration fetishist.
How about this variation? "His name is 'Bruce', and turning himself into a Kardashian did not turn him into a woman."
On another site, I was labeled a "hater" and banned from further commenting for the sin of referring to Manning as "he".
Exactly.
From what I have read in the past month or so, that sort of thing is now official -- if unadmitted -- Facebook policy.
And the kicker is, my comment didn't deal with Bradley's "identity" confusion at all. I was exclusively talking about his treason. And that's what got me into trouble - I wrote "his treason". But without addressing anything I had to say, I was kicked off for calling him "he".
I do not understand how these people can endlessly "celebrate diversity" without tolerating the least deviation from the enforced orthodoxy. And why have they adopted the rainbow as their banner, when there is far more "diversity" between a man and a woman than there can ever be between two members of the same sex? Their flag ought to be a solid gray field without emblem.
I wouldn't be surprised that part of the reason for that rainbow is to assert that it is not an emblem of God's promise to all mankind.
Post a Comment