"... when the Communists show up to protest the Nazis, you're supposed to pray for an asteroid, not pick a favourite." -- on 'Small Dead Animals'
(h/t Kathy Shaidle )
Thursday, November 18, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Backlinks to this blog?
Search This Blog
About Me
- Ilíon
- A thousand years ago, our cultural ancestors prayed, "From the fury of the Northmen, Lord, protect us!" . . . Today, we ought to pray, "From the tender mercies and caring solicitude of the Good Intentioned, Lord, protect us!"
Blog List
Links of Interest
- Alan Keyes
- American Thinker
- Archive -- Adler
- Archive -- Chesterton
- Archive -- David Stove
- Atheism is Dead
- B.Prokop (Celestial Pilgrimage)
- B.Prokop (The Observer's Chair)
- Bastiat -- The Law
- Cartago Delenda Est
- Curmudgeonry
- David Limbaugh
- Diana West
- Egnorance
- Fides et Ratio
- Superversive
- Superversive (Essays)
- The Drew Blog
- The Right Word
- View from the Right
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(217)
-
▼
November
(11)
- You're supposed to pray for an asteroid
- A potpourri of Obamanation
- What is a lie?
- Lying is not intrinsically immoral, Part II
- Lying is not intrinsically immoral
- It pains me to say this
- If the new law addresses a non-existent threat
- Democracy, cis and trans
- His Grandfather's Son
- 'Dude' Moves Like a Lady
- Scott and Scurvy ... and 'Science!'
-
▼
November
(11)
Labels
- AAR_01 (1)
- abortion (43)
- Adams (Scott) (1)
- Arguments about God (68)
- Arrington (Barry) (3)
- atheism (127)
- Auster (29)
- Babylon Bee (1)
- Bassior (Jordan) (6)
- Benjamin (Carl) (1)
- Benscoter (Doug) (3)
- Biden (9)
- Big Gay (9)
- Big Organ (10)
- blogs (284)
- Boot (Alexander) (1)
- Boreing (Jeremy) (1)
- Bush Derangement Syndrome (1)
- Chesterton (4)
- children (23)
- Chisholm (Shirley) (1)
- Christianity (124)
- Christiansen (Matt) (2)
- Christmas (4)
- Clinton (Hillary) (18)
- compromise (57)
- conservatism (102)
- Coulter (Ann) (4)
- Craig (William Lane) (1)
- creationism (4)
- crime (60)
- criticism (127)
- Crowder (Steven) (1)
- Cruz (Ted) (6)
- culture (280)
- Culture of Death (111)
- cynical marketing (319)
- Daily Wire (1)
- Dalrock (3)
- Dalrymple (6)
- Dawkins (Richard) (11)
- Deborah Gyapong (1)
- Derbyshire (1)
- Easter (9)
- economics (58)
- Egerer (Jeremy) (2)
- Egnor (Michael) (30)
- emergence (25)
- emotion (3)
- environmentalism (22)
- epistemology (69)
- evolutionism (38)
- family (35)
- federalism (111)
- feminism (100)
- Feser (Edward) (13)
- Flannagan (Matt) (1)
- free trade and protectionism (2)
- free will (108)
- Friedman (David) (2)
- Fry (Stephen) (1)
- Gagdad Bob (2)
- Geert Wilders (4)
- Gilson (Tom) (1)
- Glenn Beck (1)
- Goldberg (Jonah) (1)
- Greenfield (Daniel) (2)
- Haley (Nikki) (2)
- Harris (Kamala) (4)
- Harris (Sam) (1)
- Hegseth (Pete) (1)
- history (9)
- Hitchens (Christopher) (4)
- Hossenfelder (Sabine) (1)
- humor (129)
- Hunter (Cornelius) (3)
- Hyacinth Girl (7)
- idolatry (120)
- Iliocentrism (75)
- incrementalism (53)
- Islam (49)
- Jackson (Kevin) (3)
- Jacobson (William) (7)
- Judaism (5)
- judgment (4)
- justice (105)
- KairosFocus (3)
- Kelley (Megyn) (1)
- Kennedy (Ted) (2)
- Keyes (Alan) (2)
- Knowles (Michael) (2)
- Kristor (12)
- KT Cat (19)
- language (42)
- leftism (533)
- Lewis (C.S.) (8)
- liberalism (471)
- libertarianism (92)
- liberty (199)
- Limbaugh (Rush) (3)
- literature (1)
- Lockerbie (2)
- Loftus (John) (1)
- Logan (Anthony Brian) (1)
- logic (23)
- love (10)
- Mace (Nancy) (1)
- MacIntyre (Auron) (1)
- materialism and naturalism (110)
- Matteo (7)
- McCain (John) (1)
- McCain (Robert Stacy) (9)
- McGrew (Lydia) (10)
- McMahan (Austen) (1)
- mercy (11)
- modernism and post-modernism (414)
- Money (John) (1)
- morality (287)
- Morning Joe (1)
- Mother Theresa (2)
- Murray (William J) (2)
- My house (10)
- natural born citizen (14)
- New Atheists (37)
- nihilism (177)
- O'Leary (Denyse) (1)
- Obama (61)
- Obamination (141)
- One True Bureaucracy (19)
- ontology (36)
- overheard (129)
- Owens (Candace) (1)
- Oz Conservative (6)
- paganism (10)
- Palin (3)
- Parks (Bob) (51)
- Peterson (Jordan) (1)
- pious myths (249)
- politics (502)
- Pool (Tim) (3)
- Prager (Dennis) (1)
- Prokop (Bob) (3)
- Providence (1)
- Quartering (2)
- Race Card (8)
- racism (55)
- Rageaholic (1)
- Ray (John Jay) (4)
- Reagan (3)
- reason (157)
- Reed (Fred) (1)
- relativism (79)
- Reppert (Victor) (28)
- respect (35)
- Road to Hell (321)
- Rosen Cohen (Laura) (13)
- Rubin (Dave) (1)
- Rubio(Marco) (1)
- Rule of Law (88)
- Sagan (Carl) (5)
- Sailer (Steve) (1)
- scientism (77)
- secularism (109)
- Sensing (Donald) (1)
- shades of grey (32)
- Shaidle (Kathy) (35)
- Shapiro (Ben) (1)
- Siler (Jason) (1)
- skepticism (11)
- slavery (3)
- socialism (142)
- society (264)
- Sowell (Thomas) (6)
- statism (83)
- Steyn (Mark) (25)
- story idea (2)
- Straughan (Karen) (2)
- Surber (Don) (2)
- terrorism (37)
- The Pope (8)
- The World Was Younger Then (9)
- theism (1)
- theodicy (8)
- Thinking Housewife (2)
- treason (5)
- tribalism (6)
- Trump (15)
- Trump Derangement Syndrome (4)
- Tyson (Neil deGrasse) (1)
- Urban wildlife (9)
- Uygur (Cenk) (1)
- Vallicella (37)
- Vox Day (51)
- Walsh (Matt) (4)
- Warren (David) (7)
- West (Allen) (4)
- West (Diana) (1)
- What's up? (111)
- Williams (Walter) (5)
- Wilson (Douglas) (51)
- Wood (David) (1)
- Wright (John C.) (8)
- Wright (N.T.) (1)
- Yeagley (David) (1)
18 comments:
No one's interested in your meaningless drivel dipshit.
You must be pretty interested dippiest shit, since you go to his page
Sometimes I just like a good titter Sharon.
This guy is the biggest plagiarist on the net.
Never has a single idea or thought of his own.
Deletes anyone who comes up with a better argument.
Total intellectual coward.
I see, you're one of those people who because you are so miserable with your own life you have to try to cut someone else down so you can pretend to feel good about yourself. Eric, what a LOOSER you are!
Plagiarism: to take from another and offer as your own work. Now if he didn't link to the sites he got the info from you might be able to call him a plagiarist. By linking to the sites, he is not trying to take credit for the "work", but is in fact giving credit where credit is due. Many people have the same thoughts or interests, because they voice them does not make them a plagiarist. Apparently your definition of plagiarism is having the same thought/idea someone else has. In that case, there isn't a person alive that isn't a plagiarist.
An intellectual (of, involving or appealing to the intellect, showing high intelligence) coward (one who lacks courage or is shamefully afraid) would be someone like you that posts rude and crude comments that do not appeal to the intellect (the ability to reason or understand) instead of something that pertains to the discussion/subject.
I've seen some of the crap you posted, it couldn't be considered an argument in any way, shape or form. It was a troll trying to be rude and crude because 2 people agreed on many subjects.
Bottom line dumba$$, if you don't like my brother's, or anyone else's blog/site, stay the hell away from it instead of making yourself look like a total dumba$$ to the majority of people by making stupid remarks. Try being a prudent (exercising sound judgment in practical matters): person and stay away from people’s site you feel you have to post your snide and asinine comments on.
Footnote: definitions from Webster’s New World Dictionary 1974 edition
How many kids have you and Ilion had together Sharon. I'm guessing your parents were siblings too.
Oh, and by the way, it should be spelt "LOSER" you retard.
I am so impressed with your argument Eric and you wonder why he deletes the crap you type. You proved my point trollboy.
I am glad you know how to spell what you are.
Hey there, sis!
I see that you've met my pet troll (I'm pretty sure that one is assigned to any website or blog which takes a conservative and/or religious stance).
Normally, I delete all his droppings within hours (sometimes minutes) of their posting. But, this exchange is amusing, and were I to delete his scat, the context of your posts would be lost.
Welcome back dipstick.
I've learned that posting anything with intellectual rigour or actual facts on your little splat is a waste of time. You can't deal with anyone presenting a a stronger argument than your shallow drivel.
Your self admiration (or should that be mutual masturbation) conversations with your bum buddy Crude are enlightening in that they reinforce your lack of capacity to add anything of value either here, on Darwin's God or on Edward Feser's site.
At least your sister has the balls to respond rather than delete. Maybe she's not a rampant homophobe either.
No evidence of mental illness associated with Eric's lifestyle choices. No sir! Just utter, crisp sanity from angry, feral rant to rant.
Does the scat that "Eric" drops at my blog even rise to the level of 'rant'?
I'd hardly call it a rant. The odd puerile prod wrapped in accurate summations of your 'intellectual' behavior.
You have no idea of my lifestyle choices Crude, none at all. As usual you have demonstrated your ability to carp and harangue based on no knwoledge and no ideas.
Gee Eric, the pot calls the kettle black...you have no idea what Ilion's or Crude's or my lifestyles are (you would have to know each of us personally and that I am quite sure you do not), yet you insinuate they are gay and we are incestuous. So, to put it in your own words……as usual you have demonstrated your ability to carp and harangue based on no knowledge and no ideas.
You call this crap you post “intellectual”? Grow up Eric, the only person who thinks the crap you post is intellectual is you.
You have no idea of my lifestyle choices Crude, none at all. As usual you have demonstrated your ability to carp and harangue based on no knwoledge and no ideas.
Being gay is a lifestyle choice? I thought it was genetic? Ha ha ha.
Well, you're giving off wild indications of mentally illness, and you're obsessed with the topic of homosexuality and how everyone who disapproves of said sexual behavior is horrible and terrible.
You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to make a pretty good guess about what your deal is.
But hey, you tell me: Eric, do you enjoy sex with men? I mean, it's obvious, but I would love for you to deny your own sexual inclinations just to try and win an e-argument against what your fevered mind tells you is The Enemy of Gays. On the other hand, I'd also love for you to have gone off on this "You don't KNOW ME" rant, and then admit that actually, oh wait, I had you dead to rights.
So what's the answer, Eric? Is it the closet, or the loss?
I'm not actually gay, whether you choose to believe that or not is up to you.
I have many gay friends and find homophobia to be unjustified and ignorant. It is usually perpetrated by godbots who have signed their responsibilities and choices of conduct over to some arcane sky fairy whose creation was brought about to support power, control and misogyny.
Gay people are born that way and so deserve absolute equality with heterosexuals.
Then I see you two displaying your fear based ignorant homophobia it annoys me so I tar you with the very brush that most scares you.
Gay people are born that way and so deserve absolute equality with heterosexuals.
I thought it was a lifestyle choice? Oops, guess not! And I happened to be born this way - you bigot!
Also, I didn't ask if you were gay. I asked if you enjoyed having sex with men. Maybe you're bi. But I see you chose the closet option of denying your sexuality. Good job, sport! Pride, indeed.
"Also, I didn't ask if you were gay. I asked if you enjoyed having sex with men. Maybe you're bi."
"Gay" is actually about politics, not about where one chooses to dip one's wick.
"Gay" is actually about politics, not about where one chooses to dip one's wick.
Yep. You'll recall I wrote a post saying the language in these discussions is rigged from top to bottom, and that I don't think it fair to call someone 'gay' or 'a homosexual' or such. I stand by that.
Though, I love seeing that 'choice' card played. The problem is that, if technology continues advancing in the field, it's conceivable that one day soon one may be able to choose one's genetics even after being born (gene therapy, etc.)
The moment that happens and becomes cheaply and readily available, then suddenly having homosexual inclinations will - if there's even a partial genetic basis to it - in fact be a choice. The same goes if a good general therapy comes around that's equally accessible. Those'll be interesting times.
Post a Comment