God's Blessings ...

Congratulations, and God's richest blessings to Mr and Mrs Steven Crowder -- "We did it right."

The Other McCain: She Makes Him Sandwiches

You know that’s got to drive liberal nuts: Steven Crowder’s got the hawwwwt blonde wife — and she’s making him sandwiches.

Next? Have about a dozen beautiful babies.

They’ll never forgive you for that. Or the sandwiches.

Actually, "hot" is what the new Mrs Crowder is not. [edit: Though, taking into account the dress that she deliberately chose to wear as her wedding gown, one has to admit that she may well be a "hottie" wannabe ... in which case, the marriage will fail. In his article, Crowder references a prior article, in which he writes, "Yes, I admit it, I’m in a long-term relationship and I’m abstinent. Scandalous, I know. It’s an incredibly difficult thing to do (mostly for me, because she’s way out of my league)... ". Now, if Mr Crowder really does believe that his wife is "out of his league", and especially if he seduces her into beliving it, then similarly, the marriage is doomed.]

"Hotness" is about the mindset and actions of using one's sexualiy and whatever attractiveness one has as a commodity with which to purchase other tangible or intangible goods. Though, generally, these good are of a tawdry and temporary nature; it's simply the nature of the transaction. Moreover, "hotness" is a commodity with a short shelf-life. "Hotness", being a commodity, has to be used to be of any value ... and its use dramatically shortens its shelf-life.

'Hotness' is about the mindset and actions by which one makes of oneself, whether male or female, a slut.

Steven Crowder:

... Let me preface this column by saying this: my wife (I have to get used to saying that) and I not only waited sexually in every way (no, we didn’t pull the Bill Clinton and technically avoid “sex” sex,) but we didn’t shack up as live-ins and most importantly, we courted each other in a way that was consistent with our publicly professed values.

We did it right.

Feeling judged? I couldn’t care less. You know why? Because my wife and I were judged all throughout our relationship. People laughed, scoffed and poked fun at the young, celibate, naive Christian couple.

We’d certainly never make it to the wedding without schtupping, and if we did, our “wedding night would be awkward and terrible,” they said.

Turns out that people couldn’t have been more wrong. Looking back, I think that the women saying those things felt like the floozies they ultimately were, and the men, with their fickle manhood tied to their pathetic sexual conquests, felt threatened.

I think it’s important to write this column not to gloat (though I’ll be glad to), but to speak up for all of the young couples that have also done things the right way. When people do marriage right, they don’t complain so much, and so their voices are silenced by the rabble of promiscuous charlatans, peddling their pathetic world view as “progressive.”
...

I've written before about those pathetic-and-self-deceiving souls of the "Manoshpere" -- those "Gamers" -- who rail against the suicidal destruction that the variant of leftism known as feminism has unleashed and continues to rain down upon our society ... even as they whinge because they see themselves as missing out on their "fair share" of the booty while there is still booty to be got before the utter collapse.

The "Gamers" claim that they just want good women who will be their wives and rear their children. But, that's not the truth: what they want is a bevy of "hot" young women who will enslut themselves for them when they (the men) are young ... and for there still to be an ample supply of non-sluttish "hot" young women from which finally to choose one to marry when they (the men) are ready to "settle down".

The "Gamers" claim that they want what Steven Crowder reasonably believes he has. The truth is, they simply want no-strings sexual access to the beautiful woman. Which is to say, they don't want a wife, they simply want a "hot" woman to put out at their convenience.

The "Gamers" claim that they oppose feminism. The truth is: they want more of feminism and its hollow promises; the truth is that they're simply bitching because the so-called Sexual Revolution isn't delivering as was promised. And so, their "solution" to that problem is to double down, to turn sexuality into even more of a tool, and a weapon, rather than making of it the gift God intended.

This is, of course, hightly irrational: it cannot be both ways -- if you will make of all women sluts, then all woman are sluts (if only in your own eyes), and there are no "good women" stashed away on some hidden shelf just waiting to be pawed over when you are ready to be "faithful" (for now). If you are not willing to be faithful to your wife *now* -- before you have even met het -- why should anyone expect that you will be capable of being faithful to her ever? (The same goes for women, of course.)

The reason you all, men and women both, are so miserable, is because you are trying to lead your lives as though life were a never-ending singles bar ("meat market"): you make of yourselves sluts, you make of your "partners" sluts ... and then you whine in indignant shock that all you have to show for it is sluttishness, and heartbreak.