First, here is a comment someone made to the YouTube video linked below --
These 2 are mouthpieces of Israel, they will tell lies like pushing democracy and will counter signal nationalism whilst promoting nationalism in Israel.
Next, here is my transcription of what Haviv Rettig Gur said at @10:44 mark --
I want 'International Law', I wish we had 'International Law'. Do you know what 'International Law' would mean? ... Palestinians? What the Hell has 'International Law' ever done for them? Has it protected them against Israel? Has it protected them from Lebanon, which for decades had laws on the books [... which] treated the Palestinian refugees, for four generations, in Lebanon, the way the Czarist regime treated the Jews ... Where was 'International Law' to protect Palestinians, either from us [Israel] or from anybody? ... Well, why didn't the Arab world take in any refugees from Syria? Why [do] Germany, Britain, and France have to take in more than all the Arab world combined; each one of them, on any given month, more than the Arab world ever has?
As you can see, what the man actually said is the direct opposite of what the Jew-hater asserts that he (habitually) does. If you pay attention, you'll see that this is a recurring theme amongst Jew-haters.
By the way, there is no such thing as 'International Law'. And, unlike the speaker, I don't want there to be such a thing, because I distrust the people who rule foreign countries even more than I distrust the ones who rule ours. As he rightly says, a "law" which cannot be enforced -- you know, with force -- is not a law.
To the very limited extent that there ever will be such a thing as 'International Law' in the foreseeable future, 'International Law' is whatever international agreements or obligations the United States is willing to expend treasure, and possibly lives, to enforce.
Winston Marshall: “International Law” Doesn’t Actually Exist and The World ABUSES It | Haviv Rettig Gur
