tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479830240587990195.post6394191187442783777..comments2024-02-21T10:13:00.928-05:00Comments on Iliocentrism: From the US supreme Court Venus (1814) and Wong Kim Ark (1898) decisionsIlíonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479830240587990195.post-79567677360423086842016-07-28T11:02:05.619-04:002016-07-28T11:02:05.619-04:00From the Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 702, 703 (1898)...<br />From the <a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/169/649" rel="nofollow">Wong Kim Ark, 169 US 649, 702, 703 (1898) </a> decision -- "<i>A person born out of the jurisdiction of the United States can only become a citizen by being naturalized, either by treaty, as in the case of the annexation of foreign territory, or by authority of Congress, exercised either by Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479830240587990195.post-25157176275557392302016-07-25T12:02:38.515-04:002016-07-25T12:02:38.515-04:00KT,
Does the US Congress, or the US supreme Court,...KT,<br />Does the US Congress, or the US supreme Court, or the US President, have the power to decree that henceforth all human beings everywhere are natural born US citizens?<br /><br />Of course not! The very idea is absurd; such an attempt would clearly be a violation of the powers accorded the federal government by the Constitution. Such an attempt would be clearly be an Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479830240587990195.post-11889470363843705542016-07-25T10:10:44.179-04:002016-07-25T10:10:44.179-04:00That it's a report of a bunch of people agreei...That it's a report of a bunch of people agreeing with one another that if they agree with one another loudly enough that FALSE==TRUE then, by gum, FALSE==TRUE.Ilíonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15339406092961816142noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-479830240587990195.post-87081152497547727412016-07-25T09:38:01.739-04:002016-07-25T09:38:01.739-04:00I can understand that an I get that the language s...I can understand that an I get that the language seems pretty clear, but 1814 is a long time ago in terms of court precedents. It's practically another country. <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/04/14/new-jersey-court-rules-that-ted-cruz-is-a-natural-born-citizen-eligible-to-become-president/" rel="nofollow">What do you make of this?</a>K T Cathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10259428595745509790noreply@blogger.com